Ian Carroll is joining our Friday show to discuss the latest Epstein files drop. Submit your questions for us by midnight ET here: tuckercarlson.com/epstein-files-questions
The people who run countries believe in the supernatural. It’s the main thing they believe in. Why do they try so hard to convince the rest of us it’s not real? AJ Gentile on giants, the pyramids and remote viewing: https://youtu.be/3EAYlgYB2ko
Most Americans just want to live in a sovereign country that cares about them. That’s not a partisan position. It’s a baseline demand. Cenk Uygur explains: https://youtu.be/OOs0Kpj0g1w
Let's talk about what exactly is going on in the United States, and why it's led to the battles in, say, Minneapolis. What's happening in the United States is a wholesale change of who lives here. Total demographic change.
Now, some have called this replacement. And the question is, is it really replacement? So we thought we would look it up.
If you were someone following along at home, trying to figure out, you know, what is everyone so mad about? What is this great replacement theory? You might go, as almost everybody does, first to Google and just type in “great replacement theory” and AI would come up with the following result. This is hot off Google AI. Here's what it says if you look up “great replacement” on Google.
We're quoting: “the great replacement theory is a debunked,” meaning untrue, “far right,” meaning Nazi, “white nationalist,” meaning racist, “conspiracy claiming that white populations, particularly in Europe and the US, are being deliberately replaced by non-white immigrants and minorities, often orchestrated by replacist elites leading to demographic shifts and cultural erosion, fueling extremist violence and anti-immigrant sentiment.”
That's one sentence, by the way, a run-on sentence, but it is AI. And it's quite a sentence. And it tells you point blank, “this is not true.” Anyone who believes in it is deranged and is stoking violence simply by believing in it.
And it goes on to explain how this works: the theory “posits that mass migration, declining white birth rates, and political agendas by elites are intentionally replacing white populations. It has inspired numerous acts of mass murder and violence with perpetrators often citing this theory. Research shows that endorsers of the great replacement theory often hold anti-social traits, authoritarian views, and negative attitudes toward minorities and immigrants.”
In other words, once again, believing that the population of this or any other country is being manipulated by people in power and the people who were born here are being replaced by people who weren't—believing that is not only wrong, it's misinformation, it has been debunked, it's also dangerous. You can kill people by believing that.
Well, how does that work exactly? It doesn't sound like a cool objective analysis of the theory of replacement. It sounds instead like, well, a political screed, but maybe even more than that, it sounds like an article of religious faith. You're not allowed to believe this. Only bad people believe it. It's apostasy.
Europe is being invaded and destroyed by Africa, in a crime orchestrated by global leaders. A new TCN documentary shows how it’s happening: https://youtu.be/K_2_7fxyIEI
Thirty years ago William F. Buckley banished Peter Brimelow from Con Inc. for saying that immigration was destroying the country. Turns out Brimelow was right: https://youtu.be/zI3xsvH7b6U
What are the downsides of taking Greenland? Well, you establish a precedent that “if I have the power, I get to take what I want.” That's always been enforced. That's human nature. We've constructed a kind of elaborate series of rules, theoretical rules, designed to pretend that's not true and to mitigate it to some extent over the last 80 years, but really that's always been true and always will be true. But that's a pretty tough game. Once you write the rules that if someone can take something because they want it, it's okay. You have to live with them. NATO will effectively be done. How can you have a defensive alliance when one member acts against another? You probably can't. NATO was going out anyway.
Is it really bad that NATO is going away? No, it's a huge victory for the world and for the United States, but it's going to be tough for its many employees and for the entire infrastructure of foreign policy thinkers such as they are in Washington and Brussels and throughout Europe. They're going to have to face the reality that this is not a real thing anymore. If NATO was real, then the U.S. wouldn't have taken Greenland. So there's that, apparently a downside.
Tucker Carlson
Technology stole your privacy, and with it your freedom. Yannik Schrade has a plan to get it back: https://youtu.be/crp-mkI1tj4
1 day ago | [YT] | 7,356
View 175 replies
Tucker Carlson
Join us on Snapchat: www.snapchat.com/add/tuckercarlsonsc
5 days ago | [YT] | 700
View 124 replies
Tucker Carlson
Ray Dalio on how to prevent another American civil war: https://youtu.be/-eskzPuh_5w
5 days ago | [YT] | 5,428
View 288 replies
Tucker Carlson
Ian Carroll is joining our Friday show to discuss the latest Epstein files drop. Submit your questions for us by midnight ET here: tuckercarlson.com/epstein-files-questions
1 week ago | [YT] | 25,241
View 2,700 replies
Tucker Carlson
The people who run countries believe in the supernatural. It’s the main thing they believe in. Why do they try so hard to convince the rest of us it’s not real? AJ Gentile on giants, the pyramids and remote viewing: https://youtu.be/3EAYlgYB2ko
1 week ago | [YT] | 16,679
View 724 replies
Tucker Carlson
Most Americans just want to live in a sovereign country that cares about them. That’s not a partisan position. It’s a baseline demand. Cenk Uygur explains: https://youtu.be/OOs0Kpj0g1w
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 27,325
View 2,800 replies
Tucker Carlson
Let's talk about what exactly is going on in the United States, and why it's led to the battles in, say, Minneapolis. What's happening in the United States is a wholesale change of who lives here. Total demographic change.
Now, some have called this replacement. And the question is, is it really replacement? So we thought we would look it up.
If you were someone following along at home, trying to figure out, you know, what is everyone so mad about? What is this great replacement theory? You might go, as almost everybody does, first to Google and just type in “great replacement theory” and AI would come up with the following result. This is hot off Google AI. Here's what it says if you look up “great replacement” on Google.
We're quoting: “the great replacement theory is a debunked,” meaning untrue, “far right,” meaning Nazi, “white nationalist,” meaning racist, “conspiracy claiming that white populations, particularly in Europe and the US, are being deliberately replaced by non-white immigrants and minorities, often orchestrated by replacist elites leading to demographic shifts and cultural erosion, fueling extremist violence and anti-immigrant sentiment.”
That's one sentence, by the way, a run-on sentence, but it is AI. And it's quite a sentence. And it tells you point blank, “this is not true.” Anyone who believes in it is deranged and is stoking violence simply by believing in it.
And it goes on to explain how this works: the theory “posits that mass migration, declining white birth rates, and political agendas by elites are intentionally replacing white populations. It has inspired numerous acts of mass murder and violence with perpetrators often citing this theory. Research shows that endorsers of the great replacement theory often hold anti-social traits, authoritarian views, and negative attitudes toward minorities and immigrants.”
In other words, once again, believing that the population of this or any other country is being manipulated by people in power and the people who were born here are being replaced by people who weren't—believing that is not only wrong, it's misinformation, it has been debunked, it's also dangerous. You can kill people by believing that.
Well, how does that work exactly? It doesn't sound like a cool objective analysis of the theory of replacement. It sounds instead like, well, a political screed, but maybe even more than that, it sounds like an article of religious faith. You're not allowed to believe this. Only bad people believe it. It's apostasy.
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 15,497
View 2,100 replies
Tucker Carlson
Europe is being invaded and destroyed by Africa, in a crime orchestrated by global leaders. A new TCN documentary shows how it’s happening: https://youtu.be/K_2_7fxyIEI
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 13,050
View 1,800 replies
Tucker Carlson
Thirty years ago William F. Buckley banished Peter Brimelow from Con Inc. for saying that immigration was destroying the country. Turns out Brimelow was right: https://youtu.be/zI3xsvH7b6U
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 9,427
View 446 replies
Tucker Carlson
What are the downsides of taking Greenland? Well, you establish a precedent that “if I have the power, I get to take what I want.” That's always been enforced. That's human nature. We've constructed a kind of elaborate series of rules, theoretical rules, designed to pretend that's not true and to mitigate it to some extent over the last 80 years, but really that's always been true and always will be true. But that's a pretty tough game. Once you write the rules that if someone can take something because they want it, it's okay. You have to live with them. NATO will effectively be done. How can you have a defensive alliance when one member acts against another? You probably can't. NATO was going out anyway.
Is it really bad that NATO is going away? No, it's a huge victory for the world and for the United States, but it's going to be tough for its many employees and for the entire infrastructure of foreign policy thinkers such as they are in Washington and Brussels and throughout Europe. They're going to have to face the reality that this is not a real thing anymore. If NATO was real, then the U.S. wouldn't have taken Greenland. So there's that, apparently a downside.
4 weeks ago | [YT] | 9,272
View 2,300 replies
Load more